Czech

Not applicable.

Students will achieve a broader perspective on the issues dealt with in contermpoary art theory due to the involvement with different Department of theory teachers or invited guests.

None.

Not applicable.

Combination of lectures and group seminars in which texts on theory and philosophy or art are selected in advance.

The semester is completed by a colloquium during which students show the extent of the body of knowledge they have acquired.

Lectures in the third cycle of the course are based on a more pronounced invovememnt of the Department of Theory faculty who wiil introduce to students a chosen area of their own research.
The seminars are set up by individual Ddpartment of Theory faculty or other designated professionals who define the seminars' content in advance. Students are actively involved in the process of the completion of texts and other materials used for the seminars.

Not applicable.

The course aims at intertextualizing and deepening theoretical knowledge from a broad spectrum of disciplines ranging from traditional art history, contemporary art theory, new media and visual culture theory, currently formed interdisciplinary field of curatorial studies and a wide spectrum of related humanities which inform postcontemporary artistic practices.

Students obtain the non-letter grade upon actively participating in the semiars and fulfilling the assignments.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Erwin PANOFSKI, Význam ve výtvarném umění. Praha: Malvern – Academia, 2013. (CS)
Helena BENDOVÁ – Matěj STRNAD (eds.), Společenské vědy a audiovize. Praha: AMU, 2014. (CS)
Jacques AUMONT, Obraz (2. vydání). Praha: AMU, 2010. (CS)
Konrád Paul LIESMANN, Teorie nevzdělanosti. Praha: Academia, 2009. (CS)
Michel FOUCAULT, Archeologie vědění (2. vydání). Praha: Hermann a synové, 2016. (CS)
Nelson GOODMAN, Jazyky umění. Praha: Academia, 2007. (CS)
Peter BURKE, Společnost a vědění II. Od Encyklopedie k Wikipedii. Praha: Univerzita Karlova – Karolinum, 2014. (CS)
Stuart HALL, Representation. Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London – New Dehli: Thousand Oaks – Sage, 2000. (EN)
Umberto ECO, Meze interpretace. Praha: Univerzita Karlova – Karolinum, 2004. (CS)
Veronika VEBEROVÁ – Petr A. BÍLEK – Vladimír PAPOUŠEK – David SKALICKÝ (eds.), Jazyky reprezentace. Reprezentace jako teoretický problém ve filozofii a v myšlení o umění a kultuře, v literatuře a filmu. Praha: Akropolis, 2012. (CS)
Wolfgang ISER, Jak se dělá teorie. Praha: Univerzita Karlova: Karolinum, 2009. (CS)

Not applicable.