There are several recurring themes from the IPK project evaluation for the 2022/2023 academic year:

1. the lectures and teaching of Assoc. Ryšavý and Dr. Veselý is positively evaluated
2. the lack of clarity of the project assignments is negatively evaluated
3. the organisation of the projects is negatively evaluated
4. the possibility of defending projects is positively evaluated
5. the score ratio of the documentation and implementation part of the projects is evaluated negatively
6. the conduct of the practitioners is negatively evaluated
7. positive evaluation of the exam

Now to the measures of the above points, which are planned to be implemented in 2023/2024:

1. No changes, perhaps only the presentations will be supplemented with more references to the reference literature.
2. Project assignments are in Gitea (last year specifically here https://git.fit.vutbr.cz/NESFIT/IPK-Projekty). In order to make the assignment clearer, the plan is to split the first and second project assignments into two separate repositories.
3. As in the previous year, students will be encouraged to communicate with the tutors via BUT Moodle. Where it makes sense to do so, responses on Moodle will be accompanied by a link to a commit modifying the assignment.
4. The first project will also now have optional defences. Those who do not voluntarily attend the defences will receive a breakdown of scores for specific categories, accompanied by practitioner commentary where appropriate.
5. In previous years, projects could typically score 7 points for documentation, 3 points for code work, and 10 points for implementation. In the new edition, the ratio will be 4 points for documentation, 3 points for code work, 13 points for implementation.
6. The IPK project practitioners faced a lot of unpleasant situations in 2023/2024. These included, for example: a) increased aggression by students toxicly amplifying each other's frustrations on Discord; b) the appearance of racist and Nazi symbols written by students on shared evaluation Excel sheets; c) the near physical insulting of one practitioner during complaints. Even so, supervised PhD students will continue to be encouraged by academic staff to participate in teaching activities on the IPK course. On his own initiative, colleague Ing. Koutenský intends to minimize his participate in teaching activities at the school.
7. No changes.